Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Date
Msg-id 8484B466E886A35ACCF679DB@[172.26.14.62]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
List pgsql-hackers

--On 22. Januar 2010 15:40:58 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> 
wrote:

> Beta is still the definite cutoff; and the closer we get to
> beta, the smaller the acceptable changes become.  I think that formula
> basically applies throughout the entire cycle.

For someone like me it's hard to guess, what "small" means in that context. 
For example, i delayed my work on improving the representation of NOT NULL 
constraints in favor of the pg_table_size() patch (my time was too limited 
to work on both), since i always thought submitting beyond CF start would 
be a non-starter for such a thing.

-- 
Thanks
Bernd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)